The residents of Lawrence, Kansas, would never forget what happened on August 21, 1863, if indeed they were lucky enough to survive. The reason for the bloody raid that left nearly two hundred men dead and caused between $1 million and $1.5 million in damage (in 1863 dollars) is still the subject of speculation. Whether it was in retaliation for an attack by Senator James H. Lane’s “jayhawkers” on Osceola, or revenge for the collapse of a women’s prison in Kansas City that killed relatives of “Bloody” Bill Anderson and other guerrillas, the event that would come to be called the Lawrence Massacre was one of the largest and most significant acts of violence on civilians in the American Civil War.
It would forever alter the destiny of William C. Quantrill and his infamous Raiders. And the ramifications would echo into the next century in a small town in northwest Missouri. With the declaration of war in 1861, the North and South separated into usually well-defined areas of battle geography that marked the American Civil War. Not so in the Missouri-Kansas border country, a regional hotbed of political and armed warfare. Unlike other border states to the east, guerrilla fighting, ambushes, raids, skirmishes, massacres, and atrocities of personal revenge between proslavery and abolitionist forces pitted neighbor against neighbor and defined the region. Most of the early settlers who established homes, farms, and businesses in the northwest Missouri frontier were of Southern origin, hailing from states such as Kentucky, Tennessee, and Virginia. Only later, in the 1850s, did settlers from northern states such as Ohio migrate to the fertile, well-watered forests and prairies, armed with their convictions. Both sides founded groups that sponsored and located settlers of their political persuasions: antislavery abolitionist jayhawkers to Kansas and states-rights proslavery secessionists to Missouri.Enter the Raiders
The best known of the leaders of the Missouri bushwhackers, also called pro-Confederate partisan rangers, was William Clarke Quantrill (often spelled Quantrell in period newspapers and writings). Born in Canal Dover (today, simply called Dover), Ohio, on July 31, 1837, Quantrill was a bright but troubled young man. His behavior was constantly defended by his doting mother, who was always his champion, even as her son reached manhood. His father, a high school principal, was less supportive. In his teens, Quantrill had short-term stints of employment as a teacher in Ohio, Illinois, and later, in Kansas. As with any larger-than-life historical figure, Quantrill’s story proves difficult, perhaps impossible, to determine where fact ends and legend begins. Nodaway County author Homer Croy wrote of Quantrill, “Because of Quantrill, widows wailed, orphans cried, maidens wept.” Croy was echoing the sentiment of William Elsey Connelley, author of the 1909 book Quantrill and the Border Wars, in his introduction to the 1956 Civil War Book Club edition of Connelley’s book.A solitary youngster with few friends, young Quantrill is said to have relished inflicting pain and torture on animals, finding pleasure in stabbing horses and cattle by the roadside to hear them scream.Unsettled, he appeared to always be on the move, often pushed and honed by associations with gamblers, thieves, and killers in his late teens. In 1860, he joined a group of free-state activists, jayhawkers in Kansas, switching over later to lead a band of pro- Confederate guerrillas in Missouri to kill and maim Union soldiers and pro-North citizens. Quantrill joined the Confederate army and fought in the Battle of Wilson’s Creek near Springfield in 1861, the first major battle of the Trans-Mississippi Theater of the Civil War. But devotion to a cause and carrying out orders were not to Quantrill’s liking. He soon broke with the army, complaining that the South was not fighting with necessary ferocity and commitment, and formed a band of renegades, robbers, and murderers. Quantrill received a field commission as captain in the Confederate army in August 1862 under the Confederate Partisan Act, but he often referred to himself as “Colonel.” Unlike Quantrill, his band of raiders never was sanctioned by the Confederate government.
Lawrence Burns
On the bloody August day when Quantrill’s renegade band of more than four hundred guerrillas attacked Lawrence, which was then known as the center of antislavery sentiment, many of the bushwhackers allied with or under the leadership of Quantrill would not participate in the carnage. Even as the smoke cleared from the attack on Lawrence, Southern support for Quantrill’s Raiders was beginning to fade. After the raid on Lawrence, during the winter of 1863- 1864, Quantrill lost control of his guerrilla forces. Despite their gain in notoriety and expansion in numbers, accompanied by increasing expertise in the American Indian style of guerrilla fighting, the group was considered undisciplined and dangerous. The confidence of the men in their leader was slipping; many suspected that as a Northerner, Quantrill fought for no principles, just self-serving purposes of gathering plunder and increasing military rank. During a tumultuous winter in Texas, the group divided into bands, each commanded by a “lieutenant” such as George Todd and “Bloody” Bill Anderson. When the command returned to west-central Missouri in the spring of 1864, the final break occurred. With Anderson and Quantrill parting company before leaving Texas, Todd took command of the larger remaining splinter group. Accused of “having lost his sand,” Quantrill took a small nucleus of about forty loyal bushwhackers and headed east toward Kentucky. Quantrill supposedly informed his men that they would enter Kentucky and work their way to Washington, DC, where they would assassinate President Abraham Lincoln. But more than likely, Quantrill planned to link up with General Robert E. Lee’s army, believing that the men would be considered Southern soldiers and would be pardoned with the coming end of the war in Virginia. But public opinion had turned against the raiders. Considered guerillas and not recognized as legitimate soldiers, Quantrill’s men were denied the general amnesty offered to the Confederate army upon Lee’s surrender. Viewed as outlaws, Quantrill’s men faced certain death if captured in Missouri.Kentucky was a bushwacker’s paradise. Bandits and renegades on both sides roamed freely throughout, robbing and killing at will.The Quantrill band joined with other guerrilla groups operating in the Bluegrass State, such as the group led by Marcellus Jerome Clark (also known as Sue Mundy) to terrorize with relatively little fear of reprisal or punishment. As Quantrill’s band maneuvered through Kentucky dressed in federal uniforms, the men passed themselves off openly as members of the nonexistent US 4th Missouri Cavalry. Posing as “Captain Clarke,” Quantrill continued to use the effective guise of his command as a Missouri unit detached to the Bluegrass State to track down secessionist guerrillas. Unknown to the twenty-seven-year-old chieftain of Quantrill’s Raiders, the final hour was near. Ironically, the poseur would be chased by authentic guerrilla hunters. With the end of the Civil War around the corner, the Union had driven the formal Confederate army presence from Missouri and was redirecting troops to hunt down the guerrilla bands still operating in the upper South. Pursuit by guerrilla-hunting units became ruthless.
Closing In
Following the old adage, “It takes a thief to catch a thief,” federal authorities commissioned Union Captain Edwin Terrell, a leader of federal guerrillas in Spencer County, Kentucky, to hunt down the handful of men still in Quantrill’s band. Terrell himself held the poorest of reputations. At a very young age, he had joined the Kentucky Confederate troops. After about a year, he converted to the Union side where his federal guerrillas plundered and killed Southern sympathizers, an official but lawless band.It would be this group of “scouts,” under the command of a young officer of the worst imaginable reputation, that would hunt down William Quantrill and end his life.Quantrill’s last battle occurred in a pasture and wooded draw and barn lot near Taylorville in Spencer County, Kentucky, on May 10, 1865. Headquartered at the James H. Wakefield farm, the gang had sheltered its horses under the sheds around the barn, protecting them from a rainstorm. Some of the outlaws were relaxing, shedding tension with a sham battle of hurled corncobs and taking naps in a hayloft. They were somewhat comfortable in the knowledge that Captain Terrell’s guerrilla-hunting scouts were miles away with no knowledge of their whereabouts. But the security of Quantrill’s crew was misplaced. Terrell’s scouts were on the pike just over the hill from the Wakefield farm, across the pasture from a blacksmith shop, when they received the report of a body of horsemen nearby. According to Connelley in Quantrill and the Border Wars, “The men of Captain Terrell went briskly up the lane, and, rising the swell, charged down upon the barn, unslinging carbines and getting pistols in hand. Coming in range, fire was opened and yells set up to terrify the Missourians.” The terrified men scrambled wildly for their horses, Connelley wrote, adding that “those who were fortunate enough to mount, fled in a mad route.” Sleeping in the barn loft, Quantrill was unable to secure his gun-shy mount and pursued his men on foot. At least two heard his pleas and turned back to wait for him, guaranteeing their demise from pursuing gunshots as their leader fell mortally wounded. Many books and articles have attempted to tell an accurate story of Quantrill’s last battle, but only someone who was present would have the final information. That eyewitness to history was a young soldier named John Langford. A Missouri newspaper, The Albany Ledger, published since 1868, is rich in information about the last chapter of Quantrill’s life. In an article published Friday, October 11, 1907, the newspaper states, “Here in Gentry County, some five or six miles from Albany, resides a man in the person of John Langford who has the distinction of having shot the guerrilla. Those acquainted with him will understand why he has never been given prominence by the press for the act. He is a quiet, unassuming gentleman, and it was with some difficulty that we gained his consent to relate the incidents of the much-discussed event.”
